Giorgio Armani Rouge d’Armani Lipsticks 102 and 105 Swatches

June 14, 2011

Giorgio Armani Rouge d’Armani Lipstick in 102 is my most recent lipstick acquisition. It is a very close dupe of Rouge d’Armani in 105 which is my all time favorite lipstick and unfortunately it was released as limited edition.


In general the Rouge d’Armani lipstick line is fantastic. They have medium coverage, are moisturising, long lasting with a glossy finish – everything you ever want from a lipstick! My lips are really dry lately due to the miserable cold weather here and many lipsticks make my lips look even more dry and flaky. Rouge d’Armani is an exception because it layers on the lips in a silky veil that feels like a lip balm and doesn’t accentuate any dryness.

A closer look at 105 and 102.


Although 105 and 102 look pretty identical in the tubes, when swatched on the skin 105 is more beige whereas 102 has a more pink tone it.


I have previously reviewed 105 but I felt the pictures in my previous review didn’t do its justice. It looked so much better in real life so I’ve decided to take some better swatches of it as I have got a better camera now. It is a beautiful nudish beige with a glossy sheen.


Swatch of Rouge d’Armani in 102, slightly less beige if you pay very close attention to it.


Verdict: Although they are pretty similar my preference still goes towards 105.  It just has this transparent sheen that makes my lips look really soft and delicate.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

priya June 14, 2011 at 4:49 pm

I LOVE the Rouge d’Armani lipsticks. They have such amazing colours!


Reika June 15, 2011 at 1:14 pm

Me too. I really want to buy more of them!


JC June 14, 2011 at 8:13 pm

I think I prefer 105 as well. It’s hard to decide because they look so similar, but the swatches sold me.


Reika June 15, 2011 at 1:13 pm

Hehe only girls like us (addicted to makeup) can tell the difference!


Leave a Comment

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Previous post:

Next post: